I'll believe it when I see it. Just because someone used to be the voice of toddlers in the other Sims games, that doesn't mean that's what they're doing now.
That's just it Jarsie. She did all sorts of voices in various Sim games and some do not have toddlers. Also the guy that was involved has done voices for so many things from Sims Superstar to The Voice of ghost face in the movie Scream 4. He does a lot of video games.
Could "monstahs" refer to some kind of lifestate instead?
"I got to do the cute ones" - Implies that some of them weren't cute? Also implies she actually did rather than just helped.
ETA: Also, in previous iterations, weren't there imaginary monsters (under the bed)? Could they possibly expand on this by giving them voice/form in the future (Monsters Inc. style)?
Even though I want toddlers, this seems like the most logical theory. I just wonder why they would introduce MONSTAHS before toddlers!?
We really don't have a solid basis for assuming it's literally monsters; potentially it could be. In the scenario where it was a "monster" they would either be based on already used material, or a limited functionality object like babies.
That being said this is something we should keep an eye out. It's the first potential indicator for toddlers, but unfortunately as I said it could still be something completely different.
I was listening to some of her work... she does have a really cute giggle. Was interesting to learn she did Lily in the Walking Dead game. https://youtu.be/IboGw9NWYfQ
Some sim stuff at the end...
If she voiced toddlers and children, it seems more likely they selected her to voice children once again for Sims 4. I'm certain this has nothing to do with toddlers (just like every previous toddler speculation).
If she voiced toddlers and children, it seems more likely they selected her to voice children once again for Sims 4. I'm certain this has nothing to do with toddlers (just like every previous toddler speculation).
Earlier in the thread it was confirmed she is not voicing children.
Hoping some day for some toddlers. But also dreading they'll never come. JK THEY ARE HERE!
If she voiced toddlers and children, it seems more likely they selected her to voice children once again for Sims 4. I'm certain this has nothing to do with toddlers (just like every previous toddler speculation).
I agree, it make sense to have her voice-over the children in the game. But I wouldn't rule out the possibility of toddlers just yet since she has voice-over toddlers too in The Sims before.
Could "monstahs" refer to some kind of lifestate instead?
"I got to do the cute ones" - Implies that some of them weren't cute? Also implies she actually did rather than just helped.
ETA: Also, in previous iterations, weren't there imaginary monsters (under the bed)? Could they possibly expand on this by giving them voice/form in the future (Monsters Inc. style)?
Monsters under the bed would be a fun life state for children to discover which would also imply a generations EP
This is the first thing I've seen or heard that actually gives me a little hope. I miss my toddlers so much. It's frustrating to play without them. I honestly feel that I'm just "playing at" the game while I'm waiting for toddlers instead of fully enjoying Sims 4.
I'm right there with you. I'm just "playing at" the game, too. I'm beginning to think that's a large part of my hesitation whenever I desire to play Sims. I just don't power up the game every day. Even with my love/hate relationship with Sims3, I still played it daily.
And while I do like Sims4, and I have fun whenever I do power it up, this could very well be the root cause of my reticence. It's like I'm just waiting. Stuck in neutral. While I won't allow myself to get giddy about this 'hint' if that's what it can be called, I still maintain hope that one day (perhaps not too long from now) EA will surprise us with that return of the age stage they yanked at the last minute.
"On top of that, he provides voices for all the original cats on the Catz virtual pet program" - Said in the wiki for Roger L. Jackson... they could very well be voicing animals in the game ?
This is the first thing I've seen or heard that actually gives me a little hope. I miss my toddlers so much. It's frustrating to play without them. I honestly feel that I'm just "playing at" the game while I'm waiting for toddlers instead of fully enjoying Sims 4.
I'm right there with you. I'm just "playing at" the game, too. I'm beginning to think that's a large part of my hesitation whenever I desire to play Sims. I just don't power up the game every day. Even with my love/hate relationship with Sims3, I still played it daily.
And while I do like Sims4, and I have fun whenever I do power it up, this could very well be the root cause of my reticence. It's like I'm just waiting. Stuck in neutral. While I won't allow myself to get giddy about this 'hint' if that's what it can be called, I still maintain hope that one day (perhaps not too long from now) EA will surprise us with that return of the age stage they yanked at the last minute.
I completely understand. I could play 2 or 3 for so many hours that I could lose myself and not even know the time. I'm not one of those who miss toddlers but I miss so many other things. I tried again just the other day.....downloaded a house from the gallery....made a Sim....started the game and after about 20 minutes I shut it down.
"People really love to explore 'failure states. In fact, the failure states are really much more interesting than the success states." ~ Will Wright
Comments
That's just it Jarsie. She did all sorts of voices in various Sim games and some do not have toddlers. Also the guy that was involved has done voices for so many things from Sims Superstar to The Voice of ghost face in the movie Scream 4. He does a lot of video games.
http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0413996/
We really don't have a solid basis for assuming it's literally monsters; potentially it could be. In the scenario where it was a "monster" they would either be based on already used material, or a limited functionality object like babies.
That being said this is something we should keep an eye out. It's the first potential indicator for toddlers, but unfortunately as I said it could still be something completely different.
Some sim stuff at the end...
Monsters under the bed would be a fun life state for children to discover which would also imply a generations EP
well that was a good 5 minutes of hype
monstah = Slang for "monster."
I'm not a fan.
Of slang or monsters?
I'm right there with you. I'm just "playing at" the game, too. I'm beginning to think that's a large part of my hesitation whenever I desire to play Sims. I just don't power up the game every day. Even with my love/hate relationship with Sims3, I still played it daily.
And while I do like Sims4, and I have fun whenever I do power it up, this could very well be the root cause of my reticence. It's like I'm just waiting. Stuck in neutral. While I won't allow myself to get giddy about this 'hint' if that's what it can be called, I still maintain hope that one day (perhaps not too long from now) EA will surprise us with that return of the age stage they yanked at the last minute.
http://www.getfreeebooks.com/star-trek-original-series-fan-fiction-trilogy/
I completely understand. I could play 2 or 3 for so many hours that I could lose myself and not even know the time. I'm not one of those who miss toddlers but I miss so many other things. I tried again just the other day.....downloaded a house from the gallery....made a Sim....started the game and after about 20 minutes I shut it down.
It could be kids but she did tweet no toddlers.
Even if it's not toddlers, it can't be kids, they already have a VA for kids.