Could "monstahs" refer to some kind of lifestate instead?
"I got to do the cute ones" - Implies that some of them weren't cute? Also implies she actually did rather than just helped.
Maybe she's involved in more than one project? She did say she did then, but then she also said she just helped.
I think we should all take this with a grain of salt. She did say pretty explicitly "not toddlers". To me, if this were EA keeping it hush hush, she wouldn't be tweeting anything at all. This could be for toddlers, but there's an equal chance it could be for something completely different. We won't know until we are told what the next EP is.
I think we should all take this with a grain of salt. She did say pretty explicitly "not toddlers". To me, if this were EA keeping it hush hush, she wouldn't be tweeting anything at all. This could be for toddlers, but there's an equal chance it could be for something completely different. We won't know until we are told what the next EP is.
The only references to monsters in surveys etc are the Yetis mentioned in the vacation pack... (Unless you include zombies in apocalypse pack, or perhaps as villains in supers pack).
I think we should all take this with a grain of salt. She did say pretty explicitly "not toddlers". To me, if this were EA keeping it hush hush, she wouldn't be tweeting anything at all. This could be for toddlers, but there's an equal chance it could be for something completely different. We won't know until we are told what the next EP is.
But they seem to enjoy running around like their hair is on fire.
"People really love to explore 'failure states. In fact, the failure states are really much more interesting than the success states." ~ Will Wright
Even if she were voicing toddlers, she couldn't say it anyway. EA probably found her tweets and reminded her of the NDA she undoubtedly signed and the price she'd literally have to pay if she let the cat out of the bag too early. This is just PR control coming into play so I'm still suspicious.
I think we should all take this with a grain of salt. She did say pretty explicitly "not toddlers". To me, if this were EA keeping it hush hush, she wouldn't be tweeting anything at all. This could be for toddlers, but there's an equal chance it could be for something completely different. We won't know until we are told what the next EP is.
Someone said she deleted a tweet so she clearly said something she wasn't supposed to. I know it wasn't related to toddlers but maybe she knew to stay hush hush on the toddler thing but not the other thing. I'm not sure how Maxis handles their NDAs but unless you get it in absolute writing sometimes it's hard to know what's under NDA. I've done things that are under NDA and according to my NDA I'm not even allowed to acknowledge that specific thing happened or I could get in trouble. But my NDAs are pretty strict. She can acknowledge she's worked on it so maybe her NDA is a bit more flexible. And possibly if she DID voice toddlers that may have been a big "don't say a word about it" thing that was said multiple times. Or even if she knows of their return.
Hoping some day for some toddlers. But also dreading they'll never come. JK THEY ARE HERE!
"Monstahs" was in reference to the tweet she was replying to.... the guy said he was working on those, and she said she was working on "the cute ones" ...
The only references to monsters in surveys etc are the Yetis mentioned in the vacation pack... (Unless you include zombies in apocalypse pack, or perhaps as villains in supers pack).
I believe It's possible EA saw her tweets unfold and told her to not say anything about toddlers for example, and then she said it's not toddlers. Our it could be anything, really. We shall see!
Edit: Wow, I should have read the rest of the comments ^^ You guys said the same thing!
Could "monstahs" refer to some kind of lifestate instead?
"I got to do the cute ones" - Implies that some of them weren't cute?
I think they are planning to integrate Spore into The Sims 4
Considering the fact that this version of the game is just so insanely happy,la la,happy I wouldn't be a bit surprised if the alternate life states were Spore creatures.
"People really love to explore 'failure states. In fact, the failure states are really much more interesting than the success states." ~ Will Wright
The only references to monsters in surveys etc are the Yetis mentioned in the vacation pack... (Unless you include zombies in apocalypse pack, or perhaps as villains in supers pack).
vampires were in one of the surveys
Yetis could be cute, Vampires and zombies probably not so much.
I think we should all take this with a grain of salt. She did say pretty explicitly "not toddlers". To me, if this were EA keeping it hush hush, she wouldn't be tweeting anything at all. This could be for toddlers, but there's an equal chance it could be for something completely different. We won't know until we are told what the next EP is.
Someone said she deleted a tweet so she clearly said something she wasn't supposed to. I know it wasn't related to toddlers but maybe she knew to stay hush hush on the toddler thing but not the other thing. I'm not sure how Maxis handles their NDAs but unless you get it in absolute writing sometimes it's hard to know what's under NDA. I've done things that are under NDA and according to my NDA I'm not even allowed to acknowledge that specific thing happened or I could get in trouble. But my NDAs are pretty strict. She can acknowledge she's worked on it so maybe her NDA is a bit more flexible. And possibly if she DID voice toddlers that may have been a big "don't say a word about it" thing that was said multiple times. Or even if she knows of their return.
Hmmm. It could be, but with her NDA she's probably not supposed to go into the specifics about anything. She said monsters*, and while that could be a reference to the terrible two's, I'm not entirely sold on it. Especially if there are multiple people working on the same "monster", it kinda makes me think of monsters as a separate thing.
Could be anything though, but I think the immense speculation that's happening in this thread is a little out of control. I've seen people tagging gurus asking for clarification, which is something we won't see. I'll just wait it out, I've gotten my hopes up in the past for toddlers just to be wrong; won't make that mistake again.
"Monstahs" was in reference to the tweet she was replying to.... the guy said he was working on those, and she said she was working on "the cute ones" ...
I'll believe it when I see it. Just because someone used to be the voice of toddlers in the other Sims games, that doesn't mean that's what they're doing now.
EA Marketing Department Motto:
"We Don't Care If You LIKE The Game, Just As Long As You BUY The Game!"
I Disapprove (Naturally) I Took The Pledge!
Could "monstahs" refer to some kind of lifestate instead?
"I got to do the cute ones" - Implies that some of them weren't cute? Also implies she actually did rather than just helped.
ETA: Also, in previous iterations, weren't there imaginary monsters (under the bed)? Could they possibly expand on this by giving them voice/form in the future (Monsters Inc. style)?
Even though I want toddlers, this seems like the most logical theory. I just wonder why they would introduce MONSTAHS before toddlers!?
Look into his big blue eyes, could he be yours soon?
I certainly hope so toddlers coming to the Sims 4 would be great, though I am still very eager to get seasons, pets and some cars in the Sims 4 as well! But having toddlers in the Sims 4 would just be Sim-azing!!
However I hope that when/if we do get toddlers we get more than just the toddlers - by this I mean I hope that we got lots of content for them, so high chairs, cots, toys, clothing, pushchairs and I was also thinking that it would be cool if toddlers had bibs for when they are eating. I've always wanted to see that in the Sims
Hopefully we'll know more in a few months time, but for now I'll just keep on enjoying what's currently being released for the Sims 4
Could mean she wasn't the main voice (which may have been Donna LeTourneau) but she was a secondary voice. It's possible that they'd use different voices, then mix them somehow to create unique sounds so you wouldn't have every toddler sound the same.
Check out my Gallery! Origin ID: justme22
Fun must be always -- Tomas Hertl (San Jose Sharks hockey player)
i am not beliving anything in this topic until annouce by ea/maxi and in that poll there was a mistake even do i never got it they forgot to put in the poll choice Not intressted because supernatural the life state i have 0 intress only the content furniture and useful object has use to me
If you went the sims5 to remain offline feel free to sign this petition http://chng.it/gtfHPhHK please note that it is also to keep the gallery
Comments
Maybe she's involved in more than one project? She did say she did then, but then she also said she just helped.
"It's just called a phone."
"What an impractical name."
And who knows when that will happen !
But they seem to enjoy running around like their hair is on fire.
Someone said she deleted a tweet so she clearly said something she wasn't supposed to. I know it wasn't related to toddlers but maybe she knew to stay hush hush on the toddler thing but not the other thing. I'm not sure how Maxis handles their NDAs but unless you get it in absolute writing sometimes it's hard to know what's under NDA. I've done things that are under NDA and according to my NDA I'm not even allowed to acknowledge that specific thing happened or I could get in trouble. But my NDAs are pretty strict. She can acknowledge she's worked on it so maybe her NDA is a bit more flexible. And possibly if she DID voice toddlers that may have been a big "don't say a word about it" thing that was said multiple times. Or even if she knows of their return.
I think they are planning to integrate Spore into The Sims 4
Edit: Wow, I should have read the rest of the comments ^^ You guys said the same thing!
Considering the fact that this version of the game is just so insanely happy,la la,happy I wouldn't be a bit surprised if the alternate life states were Spore creatures.
Yetis could be cute, Vampires and zombies probably not so much.
Hmmm. It could be, but with her NDA she's probably not supposed to go into the specifics about anything. She said monsters*, and while that could be a reference to the terrible two's, I'm not entirely sold on it. Especially if there are multiple people working on the same "monster", it kinda makes me think of monsters as a separate thing.
Could be anything though, but I think the immense speculation that's happening in this thread is a little out of control. I've seen people tagging gurus asking for clarification, which is something we won't see. I'll just wait it out, I've gotten my hopes up in the past for toddlers just to be wrong; won't make that mistake again.
The reply/one she replied to is still there:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roger_L._Jackson
http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0413996/
"We Don't Care If You LIKE The Game, Just As Long As You BUY The Game!"
I Disapprove (Naturally)
I Took The Pledge!
Even though I want toddlers, this seems like the most logical theory. I just wonder why they would introduce MONSTAHS before toddlers!?
Me too!! Hahaha
I certainly hope so
However I hope that when/if we do get toddlers we get more than just the toddlers - by this I mean I hope that we got lots of content for them, so high chairs, cots, toys, clothing, pushchairs and I was also thinking that it would be cool if toddlers had bibs for when they are eating. I've always wanted to see that in the Sims
Hopefully we'll know more in a few months time, but for now I'll just keep on enjoying what's currently being released for the Sims 4
Matthew.
Could mean she wasn't the main voice (which may have been Donna LeTourneau) but she was a secondary voice. It's possible that they'd use different voices, then mix them somehow to create unique sounds so you wouldn't have every toddler sound the same.
Fun must be always -- Tomas Hertl (San Jose Sharks hockey player)
Repose en paix mamie tu va me manquer :
1923-2016 mamie