Forum Announcement, Click Here to Read More From EA_Cade.
how is the sims 3 supernatural vampires different to the sims 3 late night vampires?
Jesslovesncis
Posts: 3
I just waanted to no if the vampires in the new expansion pack supernatural vampires are different from the vampires in latenight.
PLEASE ANSWER!
PLEASE ANSWER!
0
Comments
They are more "intriguing".
But I have no idea what EA means by that. :P
They are classical, evil, more dangerous breed of vampires.
SN vampires have two on top, two on the bottom.
In this EP you're given "classical" vampires that do more than that. They can curse you with their bite, they even look like the classic vampires, not the "flashy" ones.
Basically Supernatural showcases the "true" supernatural beings rumored such as actual dangerous vampires, not the "Can I please bite you?" vampires.
The standard two fangs.
Don't the LN vampires have fangs on the bottom too?
I'm sorry but I saw nothing "Twilighty" about the LN vampires. They went out clubbing? So did the vampires in Blade. They are stronger than normal sims? Pretty much the same in every vampire lore. They can mind control sims? Also in abundance in other vampire lore. Do they sparkle in the sun? No. Are they vegetarian vampires? No. (well maybe the plasma fruit is a bit much I think it's just for convenience than anything else) Where oh, where is there twilight in any of this?
It was a small joke, of course they don't shine or sparkle, but what I mean is you get the "rich and famous" vampires, the celebrity-like feel to them I guess.
Or you can just call the Modern-day approached vampires. One way or another.
These don't. I was misinformed. Someone told me they saw 2 on the bottom in the new vamps. There aren't from all of the pictures I have seen.
The most important thing is that there are only two fangs and not four fangs on top.
Well one of the vamps was a cop living in a house with like 5 or 6 other sims not exactly rich and famous. Also in "Interview with the Vampire" they are old-school vampires but they had balls at they're place and what not.
The vampires in LN as creatures weren't celebrity like. Especially not the way I played them. The TS2 vamps also went to clubs bur nobody referred to them as rich and famous nor celebrity like.
LN vampires are just as ****** as TS2 vamps. The latter being more of a Bela Lugosi type. Anne Rice's vampires don't turn into bats either and I hardly call them "modern day" vamps. The LN vamps also fit in her lore so meh.
Oh, me too. :thumbup:
Bleh!
Still an assumption. Has to be a separate creature. Not everyone owns LN.
That must be it since nothing else was revealed about the "new vamps".
Edit: Maybe those who don't own LN won't have vamps. That's more likely and makes better sense. I can deal with that.
Jeebus! That's not what we're saying! For the love of... We don't know anything about the "new vamps" once we KNOW we'll see whether it's true or not they are more like classical vamps.
And no EA won't give you any bonus. They had the same zombies in 3 different TS2 EPs and nobody that bought a previous one got any bonus.
Personally, I do hope they're a bit more like TS2, I say 'a bit' because I don't really want them to go around with their arms over their mouths going "Bleh, bleh!" all over the place, but actually BURNING in the sunlight, and being able to turn into bats, definitely!
Jeebus! I guess we'll find out.
Bleh!
:P
and
She can bleh! Without dropping the food. How professional!