Forum Announcement, Click Here to Read More From EA_Cade.
Should destination worlds be made livable?
simopolis
Posts: 147 Member
Now that we have rental lot types in all worlds would you prefer to make Selvadorada and Granite Falls like all the other worlds?
Post edited by EA_Cade on
Should destination worlds be made livable? 59 votes
Yes…keep locals and cool things to do there but let us live there if we want!
89%
53 votes
No…I don’t want my sims living in those worlds, thanks!
10%
6 votes
0
Comments
I just started using this mod. I love it!
You took the words right out of my mouth. 👍🏼
And mine!
Adding to that, I'm not entirely against certain kinds of destination worlds being unavailable for residential lots. Batuu works better, in my opinion, as a "closed world" because of the nature of its very existence. Well, I personally wouldn't actually mind being able to set a real residence there, but it wouldn't make much sense for more than one such lot to exist there. It's not like our sims could really have friends and neighbors over for... whatever.
However, worlds like Granite Falls and (especially) Selvadorada could -- and in my opinion should -- indeed lend themselves to more than one residential lot. But even just one would be so much better than none.
Because I can't; I keep all sigs turned off.
I also really, really want my Aliens & Hybrids to live in Batuu.
It looks like a great mod. But with monthly updates and looking for mod updates, I only use the bare minimum of mods. Once Sims 4 is 'finished' and ea moved on to releasing Sims 5 content, I will get this mod.
I agree with your post and I see no problem if one can live in these neighborhoods if they wish. It is an choice that should be left up to the player. CL is useless to me as I am forced to live in CL neighborhood if I want to live an apt which I feel Apts should be available in all neighborhoods as Sims 4 is supposed to be an sandbox and I look at it as an limit to my creativity.
Selvadorada locals (their internal designation being Jungle Native, if I recall correctly) show up all the time in my saves. Well, if at least one of my sims has already been to Selvadorada, that is. There are mods you can use to slow their spawning, but I personally don't mind having them around. If my played sims can travel, why can't they?
Because I can't; I keep all sigs turned off.
I think I just want that feature... to be able to restrict sims to their world unless on vacation. Also would prefer if sims stayed on vacation when rotating to another household so we could play rotationally with sims staying nearby on vacation and showing up on lots (because I prefer sims to be restricted to their worlds when I play) but that could be just my personal preference to how I would like the game to work, and I know a lot of other players like to let their sims explore the world as they please. To me that just defeats the purpose of even having rental lots as sims can just go where they like from their homes without having to pay money. I guess this is one element of realism I wish the game catered to more. I would love if it cost money and took time to travel to different lots and worlds. It would make gameplay a little harder and more fun in my opinion but I know some people disagree.
Yeah, I see how players more into realism might want that. But I prefer an alternate version of "realism" for this game (or else I'd have to moan about my sims spinning to change outfits or age up, or about seeing any overt signs of magic or other things we don't see in real life, lol). I'd feel like neighborhoods would become pretty claustrophobic if I rarely or never saw any new faces in them. However, I do agree that it would be great if sims on vacation wouldn't suddenly NOT be on vacation just because we rotated out to play a different household for a while.
Because I can't; I keep all sigs turned off.