Well I'm not interested in CC but still that's impressive. Gotta wonder if someone places this game in Jane Fonda's or some of the higher ups in Gucci's inner circle.
I don't mind this and it's cool but this seems strange to me from a legal pov. I'm guessing he's not getting paid at all and Gucci just said it was okay for him to make CC using their brand name? This is super confusing to me on how EA would feel about a company choosing to collaborate with a modder of the community rather than EA itself?
I don't mind this and it's cool but this seems strange to me from a legal pov. I'm guessing he's not getting paid at all and Gucci just said it was okay for him to make CC using their brand name? This is super confusing to me on how EA would feel about a company choosing to collaborate with a modder of the community rather than EA itself?
They no doubt a lot of money to use Moschino, and figured Gucci is more $$, they didn’t find it cost effective
I don't mind this and it's cool but this seems strange to me from a legal pov. I'm guessing he's not getting paid at all and Gucci just said it was okay for him to make CC using their brand name? This is super confusing to me on how EA would feel about a company choosing to collaborate with a modder of the community rather than EA itself?
They no doubt a lot of money to use Moschino, and figured Gucci is more $$, they didn’t find it cost effective
EA should be paid to put other brands in the game not the other way around. Modders do it for free anyway, so there is a market for that, while most people shun advertisements, simmers love new content for their games.
Not a fan of the set tbh it looks very alpha and doesn't really fit with the game, confused why such a big brand would chose to collaborate with such small content creators rather than the actual devs. Surely if they wanted their stuff in game they'd do a Disney or a MAC and get their stuff put in the base game like the free star wars clothing set so everyone has to put up with it
I don't mind this and it's cool but this seems strange to me from a legal pov. I'm guessing he's not getting paid at all and Gucci just said it was okay for him to make CC using their brand name? This is super confusing to me on how EA would feel about a company choosing to collaborate with a modder of the community rather than EA itself?
They no doubt a lot of money to use Moschino, and figured Gucci is more $$, they didn’t find it cost effective
EA should be paid to put other brands in the game not the other way around
I don't mind this and it's cool but this seems strange to me from a legal pov. I'm guessing he's not getting paid at all and Gucci just said it was okay for him to make CC using their brand name? This is super confusing to me on how EA would feel about a company choosing to collaborate with a modder of the community rather than EA itself?
They no doubt a lot of money to use Moschino, and figured Gucci is more $$, they didn’t find it cost effective
EA should be paid to put other brands in the game not the other way around
Not a fan of the set tbh it looks very alpha and doesn't really fit with the game, confused why such a big brand would chose to collaborate with such small content creators rather than the actual devs. Surely if they wanted their stuff in game they'd do a Disney or a MAC and get their stuff put in the base game like the free star wars clothing set so everyone has to put up with it
Maybe because @thegrimcookies is a pretty good CC maker, although I might have gone with Sentate as that is more his style. Honestly some creators are so much better than the EA team
Did I eat wrong mushrooms or what
why would anyone bother with gucci in the sims and then its cc what?? like this was not brought to us by greedy ea? no???
wow. puzzled. truly.
also gucci is ugly anyway
and the cc looks mighty alpha so naw can't say I'm a fan personally sorry
Did I eat wrong mushrooms or what
why would anyone bother with gucci in the sims and then its cc what like this was not brought to us by greedy ea? what?
wow. puzzled. truly.
also gucci is ugly anyway
and the cc looks mighty alpha so naw can't say I'm a fan personally sorry
Nothing to be sorry about. Different strokes for different folk. 😊
simgirl1010
Posts: 35,837 Member
Comments
Too Good at Goodbyes forum thread
Too Good at Goodbyes blog
They no doubt a lot of money to use Moschino, and figured Gucci is more $$, they didn’t find it cost effective
EA should be paid to put other brands in the game not the other way around. Modders do it for free anyway, so there is a market for that, while most people shun advertisements, simmers love new content for their games.
They don't have to put other brands in the game.
TINY HOUSE CHALLENGE
The May Family
Modeling Career?
Where do we download the tree-house - that I like.
TINY HOUSE CHALLENGE
The May Family
Modeling Career?
Maybe because @thegrimcookies is a pretty good CC maker, although I might have gone with Sentate as that is more his style. Honestly some creators are so much better than the EA team
https://harrie-cc.tumblr.com/post/632594252102270977/harrie-x-gucci-gucci-off-the-grid-treehouse
why would anyone bother with gucci in the sims and then its cc what?? like this was not brought to us by greedy ea? no???
wow. puzzled. truly.
also gucci is ugly anyway
and the cc looks mighty alpha so naw can't say I'm a fan personally sorry
🏡 Gallery 📖 Stories 🌍 World Project 🥔 MOD/CC Free
Nothing to be sorry about. Different strokes for different folk. 😊
http://www.getfreeebooks.com/star-trek-original-series-fan-fiction-trilogy/
I wondered who'd be the first to mention Jane Fonda. I was hoping no one since political discussions aren't allowed.
I don't like her either, but it has nothing to do with the discussions you mentioned. It's her acting.
TINY HOUSE CHALLENGE
The May Family
Modeling Career?